Preparing the Military Supply Chains for War with Pacing Threats
The Department of Defense should begin preparations to invoke the Defense Production Act (DPA) to ramp up military production of essential munitions as a strategic response to the current global defense challenges. The ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Israel, alongside the potential threats posed by Iran, Russia, and China, underscore vulnerabilities in the defense industrial base and the urgent need for a more robust, rapid, and scalable defense production capability.
In the event of war with the pacing threats of Iran, Russia and China; America would not have the necessary munitions needed to keep up with the duration and intensity of the fight.
Case Study: Anduril's Barracude System
Anduril has unveiled the Barracuda family of autonomous air vehicles, revealing its offering for a Defense Department program aimed at mass producing aerial vehicles more cheaply.
Justification for Invoking the Defense Production Act
Increased Threat Landscape:
The conflicts in Ukraine and Israel have highlighted the need for large quantities of precision-guided munitions, air defense systems, and artillery. These demands have exposed limitations in America's ability to produce and replenish critical military supplies rapidly.
The U.S. faces potential military confrontations with near-peer adversaries such as China, Russia, and Iran. These pacing threats require the ability to mobilize and scale defense production quickly to support prolonged military engagements and multiple theaters of war.
Current Defense Production Challenges:
Reliance on a Limited Supplier Base: The defense industrial base has become dependent on a limited number of contractors, leading to monopolistic behavior, inefficiencies, and high costs. The consolidation within the defense industry has reduced competition and innovation, creating a situation where defense contractors are more focused on profits than meeting the actual needs of national security.
Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: There are significant supply chain risks, especially for critical components such as microelectronics, rare earth elements, and specialized materials. These vulnerabilities need to be addressed to ensure that defense production can continue uninterrupted during a major conflict.
Labor and Workforce Issues: The U.S. defense industry faces a skilled labor shortage, and the production capacity is not equipped for the surge requirements of a major war. The workforce must be expanded and trained to meet the demands of wartime production.
Historical Precedent for the DPA:
The DPA was first enacted in 1950 during the Korean War, allowing the federal government to prioritize and allocate resources, incentivize the expansion of production capacity, and ensure that the military's needs were met. This precedent demonstrates the effectiveness of the DPA in mobilizing the industrial base for large-scale military efforts.
Recommended Actions Under the Defense Production Act
Expand Production Capacity for Critical Weapons and Equipment:
Scale Up Munitions Production: Increase the production of precision-guided munitions, artillery shells, missiles, and air defense systems. This expansion can be achieved by incentivizing manufacturers to open new production lines or repurpose existing facilities.
Accelerate Production of Key Platforms: Focus on rapidly expanding the production of platforms such as drones, armored vehicles, fighter jets, and naval vessels to ensure readiness across all military branches.
Prioritize the Development of New Manufacturing Facilities:
Construct New Factories and Reopen Closed Facilities: Utilize the DPA to fund the construction of new manufacturing plants for defense production, particularly in regions where there is a high availability of skilled labor or existing infrastructure that can be repurposed.
Public-Private Partnerships: Partner with private companies to rapidly establish dual-use facilities that can produce both commercial and military products. These facilities can be repurposed during times of war to focus solely on defense needs.
Enhance Supply Chain Resilience:
Secure Critical Materials: Increase stockpiles of critical materials, such as rare earth elements, used in advanced weaponry. Encourage domestic mining and processing of these materials to reduce dependence on foreign sources.
Diversify Suppliers: Encourage competition within the defense sector by diversifying the supply base and reducing reliance on a few major contractors. This could involve supporting smaller manufacturers to enter the defense market.
Expand and Train the Defense Workforce:
Workforce Development Programs: Launch initiatives to train and expand the workforce needed for defense production, including specialized roles in manufacturing, engineering, and logistics.
Mobilize Reservists and Veterans: Tap into the pool of reservists and veterans who already have relevant skills and experience, using them to quickly scale up production efforts.
Ensure the Rapid Development and Deployment of Emerging Technologies:
Invest in R&D for Advanced Weaponry: Direct funds toward the research, development, and rapid deployment of cutting-edge technologies such as hypersonic weapons, AI-based defense systems, and cyber capabilities.
Accelerate Prototyping and Field Testing: Streamline the acquisition process to quickly move from development to production, reducing bureaucratic delays.
Conclusion
Invoking the Defense Production Act is a necessary step to address the current limitations in America's defense production capabilities. The United States must prepare for the possibility of high-intensity, prolonged conflicts with pacing threats like Iran, Russia, and China. By implementing a comprehensive plan to expand production capacity, secure supply chains, and mobilize the workforce, the U.S. can ensure that it remains capable of meeting the demands of a global conflict and maintaining military superiority.
Last updated