Call to Designate Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization

The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in Egypt in 1928, has faced bans and significant restrictions across various Muslim-majority countries due to a combination of ideological, political, and security concerns. Here’s a detailed overview of the reasons behind these bans and the countries involved:

Bans and Restrictions on the Muslim Brotherhood

1. Egypt:

  • Ideological Differences: The Brotherhood advocates for an Islamic state governed by Sharia law, which contrasts with the secular and authoritarian nature of Egypt's government. This ideological clash has led to repeated bans.

  • Political Threats and Stability Concerns: The Brotherhood's political activities, particularly during the presidency of Mohamed Morsi, were seen as a direct threat to the existing political structure. The group's influence and control over the Freedom and Justice Party challenged the stability of the Egyptian state.

  • Security Concerns: The Egyptian government has accused the Brotherhood of involvement in violent activities and terrorism. The group's alleged connections to various violent incidents have fueled claims that it poses a security threat.

2. United Arab Emirates (UAE):

  • Ideological Differences: The UAE views the Brotherhood's political Islam agenda as destabilizing to its secular governance and ruling elite.

  • Security Concerns: The UAE has labeled the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, citing concerns about its influence and potential for inciting unrest or violence. The UAE's anti-terrorism policy aligns with its broader goal of maintaining stability and security.

3. Saudi Arabia:

  • Terrorist Designation: Saudi Arabia has designated the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, viewing its political Islam ideology as a threat to its own regime and stability. The Kingdom's stance reflects its broader efforts to counter Islamist movements.

4. Bahrain:

  • Political Threats: Bahrain's government has banned the Brotherhood due to its perceived threat to the ruling monarchy and its association with opposition groups. The country's internal unrest has led to a hardline stance against the Brotherhood.

5. Jordan:

  • Restrictions: While Jordan has not imposed an outright ban, it has placed significant restrictions on the Brotherhood. The government monitors the group's activities due to its connections with opposition movements and its role in regional politics.

6. Kuwait:

  • Cautious Approach: Kuwait has restricted the Brotherhood's activities and monitored its influence. The government is concerned about the potential for political dissent and challenges to the existing order.

7. Yemen:

  • Political Restrictions: The Brotherhood’s political arm, the Islah party, faces restrictions and opposition from factions that view it as a threat to their interests. Yemen's complex political landscape has led to varying degrees of hostility toward the Brotherhood.

8. Libya:

  • Post-Gaddafi Turmoil: After the fall of Gaddafi, the Brotherhood gained influence but faced restrictions and opposition from rival factions. The political turmoil and conflict in Libya have impacted the Brotherhood's role and activities.

Here is an example of a radical Muslim Brotherhood terrorist from the UK calling for the overthrow of the UK government and demanding the imposition of Islamic law:

Western Nations Allow the Muslim Brotherhood

In contrast to many Muslim-majority countries where the Muslim Brotherhood faces bans or restrictions, the organization operates relatively freely in several European countries, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The different treatment in these Western countries is due to a variety of factors, including legal frameworks, political priorities, and societal values.

Europe:

Many European countries, such as Germany, France, and the Netherlands, have relatively liberal laws regarding political and religious organizations. These countries generally uphold freedom of association and expression, which allows the Muslim Brotherhood to operate within their borders, as long as they adhere to national laws and do not engage in illegal activities.

  • Germany: The Muslim Brotherhood is allowed to operate and has established various social and cultural organizations. However, the German government closely monitors the Brotherhood’s activities due to concerns about potential radicalization and extremist connections. Germany has been particularly vigilant about groups that may pose a security threat or incite violence.

  • France: France has a history of accommodating diverse political and religious groups. The Muslim Brotherhood operates in France through various organizations and community groups. The French government monitors these groups to ensure they do not engage in activities that threaten public order or national security.

  • Netherlands: The Netherlands has a similar approach, allowing the Brotherhood to operate while keeping an eye on potential security concerns. Dutch authorities are cautious about the influence of Islamist groups and have taken measures to address any activities that could undermine social cohesion or incite violence.

United Kingdom:

The UK has been a significant base for the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities in Europe. The Brotherhood has been able to establish a presence through various organizations and community groups. The UK’s commitment to free speech and freedom of association has allowed the Brotherhood to operate relatively freely.

  • UK Government Review: In 2015, the UK government conducted a review of the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities, which concluded that while the group had some links to extremism, it did not pose an immediate threat to national security. The review led to increased scrutiny and monitoring of the Brotherhood’s activities rather than an outright ban.

2. United States:

In the United States, the Muslim Brotherhood operates through various affiliated organizations and community groups. The U.S. legal system and its protections for freedom of religion and association have allowed the Brotherhood to function without significant restrictions.

  • Legal Protections: The U.S. Constitution guarantees freedoms of speech, religion, and association, which protects the rights of various organizations, including the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood’s affiliates, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), operate within the bounds of U.S. laws.

  • Surveillance and Monitoring: U.S. authorities monitor the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates due to concerns about potential links to extremism and terrorism. However, this monitoring is typically conducted within the framework of legal oversight and civil liberties.

Muslim Brotherhood Plan to Destroy America

Designating the Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization

Designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization is a critical step toward addressing the security threats posed by its activities and affiliations. This action would enhance the ability to combat extremism and support efforts to maintain stability and security both regionally and globally.

Historical Context and Ideological Foundations

The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928 in Egypt, has been a prominent Islamist organization with branches and influence spanning multiple countries. Despite its claim of seeking social and political reform through non-violent means, the organization has been implicated in a range of activities and affiliations that pose serious concerns for national and international security.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s foundational ideology centers around establishing an Islamic state governed by Sharia law. While the group has varied its approach over time, its core principles and objectives remain fundamentally opposed to secular and democratic governance structures. The organization's ideological commitment to political Islam raises concerns about its potential to undermine democratic institutions and promote radical agendas.

Evidence of Violent Activities and Extremist Affiliations

  1. Historical Links to Violence:

    • Egypt: The Brotherhood has been implicated in violent confrontations with the Egyptian state, particularly following the ousting of President Mohamed Morsi in 2013. The group has been accused of inciting violence and engaging in terrorist activities, contributing to significant instability in the region.

    • International Connections: The Brotherhood has established ties with various extremist groups globally, including Hamas, which is recognized as a terrorist organization by multiple countries. These connections raise concerns about the Brotherhood's role in supporting or facilitating extremist activities.

  2. Radicalization and Incitement:

    • The Brotherhood’s rhetoric and literature have, at times, endorsed violent resistance and radical ideologies. This ideological framework contributes to the radicalization of individuals and supports the spread of extremist views.

Impact on National and International Security

  1. Destabilizing Effects:

    • The Muslim Brotherhood’s activities and its influence in various countries have contributed to political instability and conflict. By challenging existing governance structures and promoting an extremist agenda, the Brotherhood undermines efforts to achieve stability and peace.

  2. Threats to Allied Nations:

    • In countries where the Brotherhood operates, its activities often lead to security concerns and strained diplomatic relations. The group's potential to incite unrest and engage in violence poses a direct threat to national and international security.

Call for Designation

Given the evidence of violent activities, extremist affiliations, and the broader impact on national and international security, it is imperative to consider designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. Such a designation would:

  1. Enable Targeted Counterterrorism Measures: Designation would facilitate more effective counterterrorism efforts, allowing for targeted actions against individuals and entities associated with the Brotherhood.

  2. Support for Regional Stability: A designation would align with the efforts of countries in the Middle East and North Africa that have already taken a firm stance against the Brotherhood, contributing to regional stability and security.

  3. Prevent Radicalization: By addressing the ideological foundations of the Brotherhood, the designation would help in countering radicalization and reducing the influence of extremist ideologies.

Last updated