Neo-Liberalism: the Cult of Ideological Purity

The transformation of certain leftist ideologies into what some perceive as a religious fervor of hate is a phenomenon marked by the intersection of political activism, identity politics, and social justice movements. This perspective argues that aspects of modern leftist thought, rather than advocating for traditional values of equality and justice, have adopted dogmatic beliefs and practices that resemble religious orthodoxy, often driven by an emotional intensity and hostility toward those deemed as ideological opponents.

The Cult of Ideological Purity

One characteristic often associated with this shift is the insistence on ideological purity. Similar to religious fundamentalism, some segments of the left have developed a rigid framework of acceptable beliefs and behaviors. Any deviation from this framework, even by those who generally align with leftist values, can result in severe backlash, often referred to as “cancel culture.” This has created an environment where dissent is met not with dialogue but with ostracism, shaming, and character assassination, resembling a kind of moral inquisition.

The Sacred and the Profane

In this quasi-religious landscape, certain ideas and identities are treated as sacrosanct. Concepts such as intersectionality, systemic oppression, and various identity markers are elevated to a status akin to religious doctrines, while opposing viewpoints are demonized. This binary view of the world—dividing people into the righteous (allies) and the wicked (oppressors)—creates an "us versus them" mentality, which can foster animosity and dehumanization of perceived adversaries.

The Rituals of Outrage

Public shaming, doxxing, and aggressive protests are seen by critics as ritualistic expressions of this ideological fervor. These actions are not merely political tactics but serve as public displays of moral commitment and righteousness. Social media has become the virtual equivalent of a pulpit, where adherents broadcast their outrage and demand penance from those who have transgressed against the faith. The speed and intensity of these reactions often resemble mob mentality, leaving little room for nuanced discussion or reconciliation.

A Theology of Victimhood

Central to this framework is the concept of victimhood as a form of moral authority. Those who belong to marginalized groups are seen as inherently virtuous due to their oppression, while those perceived as privileged are viewed as inherently suspect. This dynamic has created a hierarchy of victimhood, where the moral worth of an individual is judged not by their character or actions but by their identity and their position within systems of power and oppression. Such a worldview can foster resentment and hostility toward those who are seen as embodying privilege, regardless of their personal choices or beliefs.

Scapegoating and Hatred

The intense focus on perceived enemies—be they conservatives, centrists, or even moderate liberals—can cultivate a deep-seated hatred. The concept of the “enemy” becomes central to this ideology, serving as the scapegoat for all societal ills. The hatred directed at these groups is not just political opposition but is often personal and vitriolic, manifesting in harassment, violence, or calls for censorship. This can lead to a toxic environment where the goal is not merely to win political debates but to destroy the reputations and livelihoods of those who oppose the ideology.

The Danger of Neo-Liberalism

While the left has historically been associated with advocacy for the oppressed and the pursuit of social justice, aspects of modern leftist thought have, according to critics, taken on the characteristics of a religious ideology rooted in hate. This transformation is marked by a rigid orthodoxy, a tendency to dehumanize dissenters, and an unwavering commitment to a binary worldview of good and evil. The result is a polarized and contentious social landscape where the spirit of open dialogue and mutual understanding is often eclipsed by the fervor of ideological warfare.