Biden Works to Legitimize CIA Front Group HTS
Recent developments indicate an alarming push within U.S. policy circles to normalize Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a known Al-Qaeda offshoot, as a legitimate governing entity in Syria. This shift, potentially driven by rogue elements within the intelligence community and external actors, poses significant risks to regional stability and U.S. and Israeli interests. Left unchecked, this strategy could foster a devastating war between Syria and Israel, further destabilizing the Middle East.
Deep State Planning War between HTS & Israel
We all know Syria was controlled by a dictator backed by Russia, however; turning Syria over to militant terrorists is a classic deep state policy to setup another war. HTS is to be a tool of deep state actors to create the context for the invasion of Israel. Let us examine the moves in Syria which originated under Barack Obama's Intel guy Jake Sullivan who has continued his missions under the Biden regime.
U.S. Policy in Syria and the Risks of Supporting HTS
The ongoing debate about U.S. involvement in Syria exposes a history of policy failures stemming from deep state strategies that have prioritized short-term objectives over long-term stability. U.S. actions in Syria, particularly through CIA-backed programs and alliances with questionable actors, have often undermined broader regional security and empowered extremist groups, leading to the current challenge of legitimizing Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
Historical Context
Obama Administration (2013–2016):
In 2013, the U.S. entered the Syrian Civil War through CIA operations aimed at removing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
By 2014, U.S. troops were deployed to combat the Islamic State (IS), which had gained control over large parts of Syria and Iraq.
The CIA's Timber Sycamore program, costing $1 billion, sought to train and arm Syrian rebels against Assad. However, many of these efforts backfired as weapons and support fell into the hands of extremist groups like the al-Nusra Front (an al-Qaeda affiliate and precursor to HTS).
Trump Administration (2017–2021):
The U.S. scaled back its presence to 900 troops in northeastern Syria, supporting Kurdish-led forces that played a critical role in the fight against IS.
Despite this reduced footprint, U.S. involvement continued to be entangled with factions indirectly linked to extremist groups.
Evidence of Questionable Alliances:
A leaked 2012 email from Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton resurfaced, suggesting a tacit acknowledgment of al-Qaeda's alignment with U.S. goals in Syria.
Although there are no public records of direct U.S. funding for IS or al-Qaeda, programs like Timber Sycamore indirectly empowered groups with extremist ties, complicating U.S. objectives.
Key Concerns
Rogue Intelligence Influence: Evidence suggests that elements within the CIA and other institutions are pursuing policies that align with HTS’s normalization, leveraging terrorist proxies to perpetuate instability and advance shadow agendas. This aligns with historical patterns of intelligence manipulation, such as the orchestration of omniwar strategies through covert support of extremist groups.
Regional Destabilization: The normalization of HTS could create a Sunni-dominated proxy state in Syria, threatening Israeli security and empowering adversarial states like Iran. This also risks reigniting sectarian conflict and undermining Kurdish autonomy, further entrenching chaos in the region.
Potential Drivers: This policy shift may be influenced by Middle Eastern allies with vested interests in Syria’s fragmentation. However, internal U.S. actors leveraging intelligence networks appear to be key facilitators of this agenda.
Current Risks and Implications
The promotion of HTS as a legitimate regime in Syria represents a continuation of failed deep state policymaking. This move risks:
Destabilizing Regional Alliances: Empowering HTS undermines Kurdish forces, key U.S. allies, and increases tensions with Israel, which faces direct threats from Syrian instability.
Triggering Conflict: Normalizing HTS could provoke a war between Israel and Syria, further destabilizing the Middle East.
Strengthening Extremist Influence: Giving HTS legitimacy sets a dangerous precedent, emboldening other extremist groups seeking recognition.
Strategic Recommendations
Strengthen Israeli-Kurdish Cooperation:
Forge a strategic alliance between Israel and Kurdish forces to counterbalance HTS.
Provide intelligence, resources, and logistical support to Kurdish forces to stabilize northeastern Syria.
Establish Multinational Administration for Syria:
Advocate for a joint U.S.-Israeli initiative to place Syria under a stabilization framework that dismantles HTS influence and neutralizes extremist threats.
Target HTS funding sources and operational capabilities through coordinated intelligence efforts.
Authorize and Back Israel's Invasion and Annexation of Syria
This move is the best move one can make to protect innocent Syrians from satanic Islam.
This move also counters deep state / CIA plans and prevents the potential of an fully rearmed HTS rebel force from invading Israel. In the event of an invasion, DOD would have to deploy boots on the ground anyways. This move preempts all deep state plans.
This move also opens the authorization of a limited SOCOM/DOD deployment to assist Israel with a top-line force to neutralize all HTS rebel forces (3000-5000 troops).
Investigate and Mitigate Rogue Influence:
Leverage Congressional oversight to investigate rogue intelligence actors and their role in policy decisions related to HTS.
Increase transparency and accountability in decision-making processes tied to Syria.
Preempt War through Diplomatic and Strategic Measures:
Work with regional allies to prevent a Syria-Israel war by neutralizing HTS’s influence and addressing its normalization efforts diplomatically.
Pursue legislative reforms to curtail intelligence-driven destabilization tactics.
The normalization of HTS represents a grave threat to regional stability and highlights the infiltration of rogue actors within U.S. policymaking institutions. The US should work to empower Israel as boots on the ground to enforce administraion and annexation over the Syrian state.
By fostering an alliance between Israel and the Kurds, addressing rogue influences, and advancing multinational stabilization efforts, the U.S. and its allies can counteract this strategy, secure their interests, and pave the way for lasting peace in the region. Immediate action is essential to preempt further escalation and ensure that U.S. foreign policy aligns with its national security objectives.
Last updated