CIA Created COVID-19 Bioweapon
PreviousCall for Military Tribunals Against the CIANextCIA Violations of National Security Laws and Domestic Charter
Last updated
Last updated
A rogue CIA faction created under George Bush after the CIA's coup and assassination of President John F. Kennedy subscribes to a satanic ideology founded upon depopulating humanity. This faction is responsible for the creation, development, psychological operation and subterfuge involving the COVID-19 bioweapon and pandemic. The pandemic served as cover for this faction to usher in changes to voting laws to allow fraud in order to maintain control over the American Republic. The CIA is operating a rogue criminal organization guilty of treason. The Republic has fallen and only true Patriots within the Department of Defense can save us now.
Dr. Andrew Huff is the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, an Army veteran, and the author of a forthcoming book from Simon & Schuster called, “The Truth about Wuhan: How I Uncovered the Biggest Lie in History.” Dr. Huff came out of the top secret world. He possess the highest classification of Top Secret security clearance in the government.
Dr. Huff reported to Dr. Peter Daszak at EcoHealth, the notorious doctor who sent funding dollars to the Wuhan research labs. Dr. Andrew Huff sent a report on the origin of the SARS-CoV2 virus to the US Senate and Congress. Dr. Huff provided proof that the COVID virus that killed millions and resulted in mass starvation and global economic shutdown was created in a Wuhan laboratory. Dr. Andrew Huff submitted the letter and evidence under penalty of perjury.
Dr. Andrew Huff: This was actually a failed intelligence operation. We were actually trading China advanced biotechnology for access to and collect intelligence on their bioweapons laboratory. I believe. I can’t prove that but a number of agencies that I discuss in the book, including Dr. Peter Daszak telling me he worked with the CIA.
Elizabeth MacDonald: So Dr. Peter Daszak is working with the CIA? Is that what you just said?
Dr. Huff: Correct. He approached me and asked me should he work with them. And then in the next two months he inferred he was working with them. In the next two months he told me the relationship or the work with them was received.
EcoHealth Alliance received the majority of its funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), a State Department subsidiary that serves as a frequent cover for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Their second largest source of funding was from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), which is a branch of the Department of Defense (DOD) which states it is tasked to “counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks.”
From 2009 to 2019, USAID partnered with EcoHealth Alliance on their PREDICT program which identified over 1,200 new viruses, including over 160 coronavirus strains; trained roughly 5,000 people around the world to identify new diseases; and improved or developed 60 research laboratories. What better way for the CIA to collect intelligence on the world’s biological warfare capabilities?
Dr. Andrew Huff received his Ph.D. in Environmental Health specializing in emerging diseases before becoming an Associate Vice President at EcoHealth Alliance, where he developed novel methods of bio-surveillance, data analytics, and visualization for disease detection.
On January 12, 2022, Dr. Andrew Huff issued a public statement (on Twitter) in which he claimed, Peter Daszak, the President of EcoHealth Alliance, told him that he was working for the CIA.
Dr. Huff continued, “…I wouldn’t be surprised if the CIA / IC community orchestrated the COVID coverup acting as an intermediary between Fauci, Collins, Daszak, Baric, and many others. At best, it was the biggest criminal conspiracy in US history by bureaucrats or political appointees.”
In April 2020, Daszak opposed the public release of Covid-19-related virus sequence data that has been gathered from China, as part of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) PREDICT program because he said it would bring “very unwelcome attention” to the aforementioned “PREDICT and USAID” programs.
In September 2020, scientists were outraged when Daszak was chosen to lead the World Health Organization task force examining the possibility that Covid-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Despite many clear attempts to cut off a legitimate scientific inquiry into the Wuhan lab origin hypothesis, the theory continued to persist predominantly due to the fact that the Chinese government was unable to provide a single shred of evidence in support of the natural origin theory.
From the United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability:
Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) revealed new allegations that Dr. Fauci went to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Headquarters to “influence” its COVID-19 origins investigation.
Fauci was admitted to CIA headquarters “without a record of entry” while the agency was conducting its official analysis of the origins of COVID-19. The letter claims Fauci “participated in the analysis to ‘influence’ the Agency’s review.” The date of the alleged meeting is not disclosed.
Dr. Fauci’s questionable presence at the CIA, coupled with recently uncovered evidence that he, Dr. Fauci, “prompted” the drafting of “Proximal Origin” — the infamous paper that was used to attempt to “disprove” the lab leak theory — lends credence to heightened concerns about the promotion of a false COVID-19 origins narrative by multiple federal government agencies.
Did Fauci request the meeting or the CIA?
Why was the meeting held in secret?
Who authorized the meeting?
Was the CIA aware that Fauci had interests that may have conflicted with his ability to make an objective assessment of the origins of COVID-19?
Dr. Fauci has committed perjury before Congress. It has since been discovered that his aids committed a conspiracy to evade public records by cloaking communications.
The evidence "incriminates Dr. Morens in undermining the operations of the U.S. government, unlawfully deleting federal COVID-19 records, using a personal email to avoid the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and repeatedly acting unbecoming of a federal employee." FOIA allows the public to access records from federal agencies, with some exemptions regarding national security, personal privacy and other matters.
The committee, led by Republican Representative Brad Wenstrup, alleges evidence raises "serious questions as to whether Dr. Fauci took part in a conspiracy amongst the highest levels of [The National Institutes of Health] NIH to hide official records related to the origins of COVID-19."
The committee cited emails such as one from Morens on April 21, 2021, to the president of EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Peter Daszak, which stated:
"PS, I forgot to say there is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble."
Exactly a month later, Morens sent an email, on which Daszak was copied, saying:
"I suggested [he] try to interview Tony directly and connected him to our 'secret' back channel. He emailed Tony a few hours ago."
Other emails by Morens repeatedly encouraged people to:
"email me on gmail only, with the caveat that no other govt. employee is copied at a govt address, as all govt emails are potentially FOIA'able."
From the beginning of the pandemic, there has been a persistent government effort to silence and marginalize those who questioned NIH’s policies and conclusions.
It began with coordinated attacks on those who challenged the government’s COVID policies, which was first revealed when the American Institute for Economic Research published emails showing NIH Director Francis Collins instructing subordinates (including Fauci) on the need for “a quick and devastating published take down (sic)” of the premises of the Great Barrington Declaration, whose authors Collins described as “fringe epidemiologists.” (These “fringe” epidemiologists came from Stanford, Harvard, and Oxford University.)
The attacks later shifted toward those who challenged the government’s assertion that COVID could only have originated naturally, a claim that was treated as dogma. Social media sites suspended users (at the behest of the government) who suggested COVID could have been man-made.
It’s become apparent that “fighting misinformation” was never NIH’s goal, or that of any other government agency. The goal was to fight information that conflicted with the government’s narratives, a common practice of authoritarian regimes.
David Asher, the man who led the State Department’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19, recently explained to New York magazine journalist David Zweig that the reason we have so little information about COVID’s origins is because people in power prefer it that way.
“Our own State Department told us ‘don’t get near this thing, it’ll blow up in your face,’” Asher told Zweig. “It’s a massive coverup spanning from China to DC.”
To Anthony Fauci:
Why did you authorize in vivo Gain of Function research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill by Ralph Baric during the Gain of Function moratorium in October 2014?
Why did the Department of Health and Human Services transfer ownership of Ralph Baric’s “Infectious, Replication Defective Clone of Coronavirus” patent from UNC to the National Institutes of health over 1 year before the pandemic?
Why was Ralph Baric able to transfer the COVID “Vaccine” material to Moderna prior to the first patient reported in Wuhan?
Why was the Adverse Event Following Vaccine definition changed in 2018 to exclude adverse events that were not reported in the literature?
To Peter Daszak:
Why did you state: To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs (medical countermeasures) such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process ’. - Peter Daszak, National Academy of Science March 2015 Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses - Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases - NCBI Bookshelf (http://nih.gov).
To Ralph Baric:
When you presented at the DARPA MITRE conference in 2005 stating that synthetic coronavirus was a biowarfare enabling technology, why did you spend the next 15 years developing more lethal strains?
When you published your Gain of Function Research in 2016 on Coronavirus Poised for Human Emergence, why did you use the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 sequence for this research?
And why haven’t you told the public the other sequences you’ve recreated from Wuhan since 2012?
How much money did you make on Remdesivir after knowing that it killed 53% of Ebola patients in the African clinical trials that the WHO determined to be unethical?
A report on the origin of COVID-19 written by Major Joseph Murphy for the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) was released on 11 January 2021.
The officer states that COVID-19 came from a research project (Project Defuse) on bats in China and in the US, conducted by the NGO Ecohealth Alliance and funded by the NIH/NIAID. DARPA purportedly received Ecohealth Alliance's proposal in 2018 but refused to provide the USD 14 million requested – including around USD 1 million for the laboratory in Wuhan – due to safety concerns. A total of USD 86,378.25 was budgeted for a test on the deployment of immune-boosting aerosols in a bat cave in China.
