Quantum Theory of the Soul
Executive Summary
The Quantum Theory of the Soul is based on monism, in which the soul, spiritual heart, mind, energy, and matter are parts of and different aspects of one existence, the universal quantum vibrational field of oneness we call Creator God.
Key Points:
Quantum Particles and Simultaneity: The theorem begins with the notion that everything in the universe consists of quantum particles, which can exist in multiple states or locations simultaneously. This implies that traditional concepts of space and time might not apply at the quantum level.
String Theory and Quantum Strings: It introduces string theory, which posits that fundamental particles are one-dimensional strings rather than zero-dimensional points. These strings are incredibly small, at the Planck length, and their behavior suggests a fluidity in how we understand physical dimensions.
Ether Theory: Historically, ether was thought to be a medium through which light and other forces traveled. Though modern physics, especially Einstein’s theory of relativity, has disproven the necessity of ether for electromagnetic waves, the idea of ether as a versatile, pervading substance is revisited to suggest it might still play a role in quantum processes.
Mass-Energy Relationship: Einstein’s famous equation E=mc^2 is discussed to illustrate the deep connection between mass and energy. Recent advancements have demonstrated that matter can indeed be created from light, supporting the idea that the universe’s fundamental building blocks might be more malleable than previously thought.
Consciousness and the Soul: The theorem also incorporates Dr. Eben Alexander’s insights from his near-death experience, suggesting that consciousness may exist independently of the brain and could continue after death. This supports the notion of reincarnation by proposing that consciousness is not bound by physical constraints and could potentially be reborn in different forms.
The Quantum Theory of Reincarnation
“The statistical probability that reincarnation does in fact occur is so overwhelming . . . that cumulatively the evidence is not inferior to that for most if not all branches of science... Doris Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, physicist
Everything in the known universe consists of quantum particles. These particles can as well be in one place as another, even at the same time.
The crucial word here is "simultaneously." I take it to mean that Everything can be thought of as being in no particular place at any particular time. If you choose to think of it that way, be my guest.
Whatever you think will be sublimely irrelevant, because places and times are concepts we bring with us to the quantum level. They do not seem to exist there. Or if they do, they are created only in the act of our applying them, and our measurements have meaning to us but not to them.
Experts have had decades to make this clear. If Everything consists of quantum strings, then what, you may well ask, is a quantum string?
A string is one of the main objects of study in string theory, a branch of theoretical physics. There are different string theories, many of which are unified by M-theory.
A string is an object with a one-dimensional spatial extent, unlike an elementary particle which is zero-dimensional, or point-like.
And what is one dimensional, as opposed to zero dimensional? My layman's rule of thumb is that if something has no dimensions, then it is nothing. Obviously I am naive. So let's turn to one-dimensional strings, which now seem as tangible as a cantaloupe compared to zero-dimensional particles. At least there is something there. It is, as you may have guessed, very small. It is no larger than the Planck length. What size is a Planck length?
Current theory suggests that one Planck length is the smallest distance or size about which anything can be known.
In other words, if they ever find something smaller than the Planck length, then that will be the Planck length. When we layman refer to something's "distance or size," we think we are describing two different things, i.e.: The large dog is ten feet away from me. No, that would be its distance and size. At the quantum level, distance and size might as well be each other.
To cut to the chase: Everything could well be anywhere at the same time.
The Theory of Ether
Ether is very versatile and can be transformed into matter, energy or even essence by spells... a spell does not detect the presence of ether, since ether is everywhere; rather it detects disturbances in the pattern or flow of ether.
Matthew Rees, Philosopher of Magik
In ancient and medieval philosophy, ether was often considered a fifth element, in addition to earth, air, fire, and water. It was thought to be the substance that made up the heavenly spheres and bodies, and it was believed to permeate all space and support the celestial movements.
In the 19th century, ether (or "aether") was hypothesized as a medium filling space through which light waves propagated. Scientists believed it was necessary for transmitting electromagnetic waves because space appeared to be empty. This idea was later disproved by Einstein’s theory of relativity, which showed that light can travel through a vacuum without needing an ether medium.
E = MC2
Albert Einstein proposed the most famous formula in physics in a 1905 paper on Special Relativity titled Does the inertia of an object depend upon its energy content?
Essentially, the equation says that mass and energy are intimately related. Atom bombs and nuclear reactors are practical examples of the formula working in one direction, turning matter into energy.
But until now there has been no way to do the reverse, turn energy into matter. What makes it particularly hard is that c2 term, the speed of light squared. It accounts for the huge amounts of energy released in nuclear reactions, and the huge amount you’d need to inject to turn energy into matter.
Despite all physicists accepting the theory to be true, when Breit and Wheeler first proposed the theory, they said that they never expected it be shown in the laboratory. Nearly 80 years later, we prove them wrong. Professor Steve Rose, Department of Physics
In 2014, Physicists - Oliver Pike, Felix Mackenroth, Edward Hill and Steve Rose - from Imperial’s Blackett Physics Laboratory discovered how to create matter from light - a feat thought impossible when the idea was first theorised 80 years ago.
What was so surprising to us was the discovery of how we can create matter directly from light using the technology that we have today. Professor Steve Rose, Department of Physics
Their article in Nature Photonics proposes that a new kind of collider be built, one that smashes photons instead of protons, as at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN where the Higgs boson was discovered last year.
Pike, the lead author on the paper, said: "Although the theory is conceptually simple, it has been very difficult to verify experimentally. We were able to develop the idea for the collider very quickly, but the experimental design we propose can be carried out with relative ease and with existing technology. Within a few hours of looking for applications of hohlraums outside their traditional role in fusion energy research, we were astonished to find they provided the perfect conditions for creating a photon collider. The race to carry out and complete the experiment is on."
Guess what happened in 2020? Only 6 years later, Pike and his team have been proven correct.
If you read the equation E=mc² from right to left, you’ll see that a small amount of mass produces a huge amount of energy because of the c² constant, which is the speed of light squared. But if you look at the formula the other way around, you’ll see that you need to start with a huge amount of energy to produce even a tiny amount of mass.”
Alessandro Tricoli, researcher at Brookhaven National Laboratory—the US headquarters for the ATLAS experiment.
Matter Can Be Made From Light
The LHC is one of the few places on Earth that can produce and collide energetic photons, and it’s the only place where scientists have seen two energetic photons merging and transforming into massive W bosons.
Neurosurgeon says brain does not create consciousness
Neurosurgeon Dr. Eben Alexander says that science shows that the brain does not control consciousness, and that there is reason to believe our consciousness continues after death, giving validity to the idea of an afterlife.
Dr. Eben Alexander spent over 25 years as an academic neurosurgeon, including 15 years at the Brigham & Women’s Hospital, the Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston. Over those years he personally dealt with hundreds of patients suffering from severe alterations in their level of consciousness. Many of those patients were rendered comatose by trauma, brain tumors, ruptured aneurysms, infections, or stroke. He thought he had a very good idea of how the brain generates consciousness, mind and spirit.
In the predawn hours of November 10, 2008, he was driven into coma by a rare and mysterious bacterial meningo-encephalitis of unknown cause. He spent a week in coma on a ventilator, his prospects for survival diminishing rapidly. On the seventh day, to the surprise of everyone, he started to awaken. Memories of his life had been completely deleted inside of the coma, yet he awoke with memories of a fantastic odyssey deep into another realm – more real than this earthly one! His older son advised him to write down everything he could remember about his journey, before he read anything about near-death experiences, physics or cosmology. Six weeks later, he completed his initial recording of his remarkable journey, totaling over 20,000 words in length. Then he started reading, and was astonished by the commonalities between his journey and so many others reported throughout all cultures, continents and millennia. His journey brought key insights to the mind-body discussion and to our human understanding of the fundamental nature of reality. His experience clearly revealed that we are conscious in spite of our brain – that, in fact, consciousness is at the root of all existence.
His story offers a crucial key to the understanding of reality and human consciousness. It will have a major effect on how we view spirituality, soul and the non-material realm. In analyzing his experience, including the scientific possibilities and grand implications, he envisions a more complete reconciliation of modern science and spirituality as a natural product.
He has been blessed with a complete recovery that is inexplicable from the viewpoint of modern Western medicine.
His latest book on the subject of consciousness and reality, Living in a Mindful Universe: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Heart of Consciousness, co-authored with Karen Newell, will be released in Fall 2017 by Rodale Books. His first book, Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Afterlife (2012), debuted at #1 on the New York Times Bestseller list and remained in the top ten for over a year. His second book, The Map of Heaven: How Science, Religion and Ordinary People are Proving the Afterlife (2014), explores humankind’s spiritual history and the progression of modern science from its birth in the seventeenth century, showing how we forgot, and are now at last remembering, who we really are and what our destiny truly is. His story was featured in a series of peer-reviewed medical articles about near-death experiences (NDEs) in Missouri Medicine(2015), now published as the book The Science of Near-Death Experiences (edited by John C. Hagan III, 2017). It concludes with his chapter, “Near-Death Experiences, The Mind-Body Debate, and The Nature of Reality.”
References
Last updated
