Science of Giving

The Law of Reciprocity states to Give is to Recieve

Science of Sharing

Giving and sharing can be good for your health in several ways. First, sharing and giving have been linked to a greater sense of purpose and meaning in life, which has been associated with better physical and mental health outcomes (Hill & Turiano, 2014). Additionally, engaging in prosocial behaviors, such as sharing and giving, has been linked to reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety (Poulin et al., 2013). Moreover, sharing and giving have been associated with increased social support and social connections, which are important factors for maintaining good physical and mental health (Cohen & Wills, 1985).

Biology of Sharing

Giving and sharing are fundamental aspects of human social behavior that have been observed across cultures and throughout history. Giving involves voluntarily transferring resources, such as time, money, or other material goods, to others without any expectation of immediate or direct personal gain. Sharing, on the other hand, involves dividing or distributing resources among a group of individuals for mutual benefit. The act of giving and sharing can bring people closer together, strengthen social bonds, and promote greater overall well-being.

Research has identified several physical, mental, and social benefits associated with giving and sharing. Sharing and giving have been linked to lower levels of stress, which can have numerous negative effects on health, including increased risk of cardiovascular disease, depression, and other health problems (Piferi et al., 2006). Finally, giving and sharing can improve social connections and strengthen relationships with others.

Evolutionary theories suggest that giving and sharing have adaptive benefits that have helped humans survive and thrive as a species. Kin selection proposes that individuals are more likely to help close relatives because they share many of the same genes. Reciprocal altruism suggests that individuals are more likely to help others who have helped them in the past or who are likely to help them in the future. Group selection proposes that altruistic behavior can benefit the survival and success of groups as a whole.

Neuroscience research has identified several brain regions and neural systems that are involved in the process of giving and sharing. The reward system, which involves the release of dopamine in response to pleasurable experiences, is activated when individuals give or share resources. The empathy network, which includes regions of the brain involved in emotional processing and perspective-taking, is also activated when individuals engage in giving and sharing. The oxytocin system, which is associated with social bonding and trust, has also been implicated in the process of giving and sharing.

Giving as an Essential Principle of Torah

Giving or charity, or "tzedakah" in Hebrew, is an important value in Torah, which is the central text of Jewish tradition. Giving is seen as a fundamental aspect of Jewish ethics and morality, and is closely linked to the practice of loving-kindness, or "chesed."

In the Torah, there are many examples of giving being emphasized as a way of fulfilling one's obligations to God and to others. For example, the Torah teaches that people should give a portion of their income to support those who are in need, such as widows, orphans, and strangers. The Torah also emphasizes the importance of giving as a way of expressing gratitude to God for the blessings that one has received.

Giving is seen as an important spiritual practice in Judaism because it involves cultivating a sense of generosity and compassion towards others, and seeking to alleviate their suffering. It is also seen as a way of fulfilling the commandment to "love your neighbor as yourself," and of emulating God's compassionate and merciful nature.

In addition to its spiritual benefits, giving is also seen as an important ethical principle in Torah. The Jewish tradition teaches that people should strive to be charitable and generous towards others, particularly those who are in need or suffering. This involves acts of kindness, charity, and social justice, and is seen as an essential aspect of living a morally upright life.

Overall, giving or charity is an important concept in Torah because it reflects the values of generosity, compassion, and social responsibility that are at the heart of Jewish ethics and morality. It is seen as a way of expressing gratitude to God, of fulfilling one's obligations to others, and of living a life of kindness, generosity, and social justice.


  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.

    Hill, P. L., & Turiano, N. A. (2014). Purpose in life as a predictor of mortality across adulthood. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1482-1486.

    Piferi, R. L., Lawler, K. A., & Jobe, R. L. (2006). Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 1865-1870.

    Poulin, M. J., Brown, S. L., Dillard, A. J., & Smith, D. M. (2013). Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. Health Psychology, 32(4), 401-409.

  • Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622-1625.

  • Hein, G., & Singer, T. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: The empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 153-158.

  • Zak, P. J., Stanton, A. A., & Ahmadi, S. (2007). Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PloS One, 2(11), e1128.

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1-16.

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.

  • Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 327-348.

  • Aaker, J., Rudd, M., & Mogilner, C. (2011). If money doesn’t make you happy, consider time. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 126-130.

  • Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086-4091.

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

  • Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 66-77.

  • Piferi, R. L., Lawler, K. A., & Jobe, R. L. (2006). Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 1865-1870.

  • Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14(4), 320-327.

Last updated