Rockefeller Faction
Last updated
Last updated
We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order. -David Rockefeller, 1994
The following was spoken by David Rockefeller at the Bilderberger Meeting, Baden Germany, June 1991. Rockefeller has devoted his life to one world government, i.e. the New World Order (NWO). He founded the Trilateral Commission and is integral to the Council on Foreign Relations.
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
Later, he notes: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, one world if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
The Rockefeller family works behind the scenes to shape global events and control political and economic systems. The are one of the heads of the American network for the NWO. The Rockefeller family is indeed well-known for its historical shaping of America's business, philanthropy, education, healthcare and public policy. They have established numerous institutions and contributed to various causes.
John D. Rockefeller (1839–1937) is “widely considered the wealthiest American of all time, and the richest person in modern history.” Rockefeller is probably most famous for securing a monopoly in America’s oil market, but many people haven’t heard the rest of the story. By the turn on the 20th century, Rockefeller controlled 90% of all petroleum refineries in the America through ownership of the Standard Oil Corporation (later split into Mobil, Chevron, Exxon, etc.).
The Rockefeller family played a significant, though indirect, role in the establishment and development of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Here's how they contributed:
Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Influence: Before the CIA, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) was the primary intelligence agency during World War II. Nelson Rockefeller, a prominent member of the Rockefeller family, was appointed Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs (CIAA) in 1940, a role in which he worked closely with the OSS. His efforts in Latin America helped shape U.S. intelligence operations, influencing the structure and strategies that would later be adopted by the CIA.
Allen Dulles and the Rockefeller Connection: Allen Dulles, who became the first civilian Director of Central Intelligence, had deep connections with the Rockefeller family. He was a lawyer at Sullivan & Cromwell, a firm that worked closely with the Rockefellers. Additionally, Dulles served on the board of various Rockefeller organizations, which helped him build the relationships and influence that were instrumental in his appointment as CIA Director.
Rockefeller Brothers Fund and National Security: The Rockefeller Brothers Fund played a key role in shaping U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War, including the development of the CIA. The Rockefeller Brothers Special Studies Project, initiated in the 1950s, produced a series of reports that recommended strategies for national security, many of which aligned with the CIA's emerging role in global intelligence and covert operations.
Philanthropy and Policy Influence: Through their extensive philanthropic efforts, the Rockefellers funded institutions and think tanks that influenced U.S. policy, including intelligence and national security. These institutions provided intellectual frameworks that supported the expansion and justification of the CIA’s activities during the Cold War.
The Rockefeller family played a crucial role in the establishment and support of the Club of Rome, an influential global think tank focused on addressing complex global issues, particularly in the fields of environmental sustainability, economic development, and population growth. Here’s how the Rockefellers contributed to the creation and success of the Club of Rome:
Financial Support: The Rockefeller family, through its various philanthropic foundations, provided significant financial support to the Club of Rome. The Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund were among the key funders of the Club's early activities. This financial backing was crucial for the Club's ability to conduct research, organize meetings, and publish influential reports like The Limits to Growth.
Influence and Networking: The Rockefellers had a vast global network of influential contacts in politics, business, and academia. They used this network to help establish the Club of Rome as a credible and powerful organization. David Rockefeller, in particular, played a pivotal role in connecting the Club with other influential groups and individuals, which helped to amplify the Club's reach and impact.
Intellectual Contributions: Members of the Rockefeller family, particularly those involved in environmental and social issues, were aligned with the Club of Rome's mission of addressing global challenges through interdisciplinary research and international cooperation. The Rockefellers' support for environmental and population research through their foundations aligned closely with the Club of Rome's focus on similar issues.
Supporting the Publication of The Limits to Growth: The Rockefeller Foundation was instrumental in funding the research that led to the publication of The Limits to Growth in 1972, the Club of Rome's most famous and influential report. This report, which used computer models to predict the consequences of unchecked economic and population growth, had a profound impact on global discussions about sustainability and the environment.
In summary, the Rockefeller family contributed to the establishment and success of the Club of Rome through financial support, leveraging their extensive network, and aligning their philanthropic efforts with the Club's mission.
The Rockefeller family played a significant role in supporting the eugenics movement in the early 20th century through financial contributions, research funding, and institutional support. Here’s how they were involved:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: The Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller family provided substantial funding to the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, New York. The ERO was one of the key institutions in the United States dedicated to the study and promotion of eugenics. It conducted extensive research on heredity, genetics, and human traits, often advocating for policies such as forced sterilization of those deemed "unfit."
Kaiser Wilhelm Institute: The Rockefeller Foundation also funded eugenics research in Europe, notably at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics in Germany. This institute later became associated with Nazi racial policies, although the Rockefeller Foundation ceased its funding before World War II.
University Support: The Rockefeller Foundation provided grants to various universities, supporting eugenics research and the establishment of eugenics programs in academic institutions. This helped to legitimize eugenics as a scientific field and integrated eugenics ideas into public health, biology, and social science curricula.
Support for Public Policies: Through their influence on public health and policy circles, the Rockefellers indirectly supported eugenics-inspired policies, including forced sterilizations and restrictive immigration laws based on racial and genetic considerations. The funding and research they supported were often used to justify these policies.
International Influence: The Rockefeller Foundation's focus on public health eventually extended to population control initiatives, which were influenced by eugenic ideas. The Foundation funded research and programs aimed at reducing population growth in developing countries, often under the guise of improving public health and economic conditions. While these efforts were not explicitly eugenic in the later years, they were rooted in earlier eugenic thinking about managing population "quality" and "quantity."
Shift in Focus: Over time, as eugenics became increasingly discredited, particularly after World War II and the revelations of Nazi atrocities, the Rockefeller Foundation and related entities shifted their focus from eugenics to more broadly defined genetics and public health research. This shift helped distance their earlier support from the more controversial aspects of the eugenics movement.
The Rockefeller family played a central role in shaping modern medicine in the United States and beyond, particularly through their influence on medical education, healthcare institutions, and pharmaceutical development. Their efforts contributed to the marginalization of holistic and natural medicine. Here’s how they did it:
Flexner Report (1910): One of the most significant ways the Rockefeller family influenced modern medicine was by funding the Flexner Report, which was commissioned by the Carnegie Foundation but heavily supported by Rockefeller philanthropy. Abraham Flexner’s report led to a major overhaul of medical education in the United States, promoting a model of medicine based on the German approach, which emphasized scientific research, laboratory work, and the use of pharmaceutical drugs.
Creation of Elite Medical Schools: Following the Flexner Report, the Rockefeller Foundation funded the restructuring of medical schools, favoring institutions that adhered to the new, science-based model. Many schools that focused on holistic or natural approaches were either reformed to fit this model or shut down due to lack of funding. As a result, the curriculum in medical schools shifted almost entirely to allopathic medicine, which focuses on the use of drugs and surgery to treat illness.
Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research: Founded in 1901 (later renamed Rockefeller University), this institution became one of the world’s leading centers for medical research, with a strong focus on pharmaceutical development and biomedical research. It set the standard for modern medical research institutions and influenced the direction of medical science towards drug-based treatments.
Public Health Initiatives: The Rockefeller Foundation was instrumental in establishing public health programs around the world, focusing on disease control through vaccination, hygiene, and pharmaceutical interventions. These programs often sidelined traditional and natural methods of healthcare in favor of more “scientific” approaches.
Investment in Pharmaceuticals: The Rockefeller family had significant investments in the pharmaceutical industry. They were major shareholders in companies that produced synthetic drugs and chemicals, including those that later evolved into global pharmaceutical giants. The promotion of pharmaceutical solutions to health problems became a central aspect of the Rockefeller approach to medicine.
Shaping Public Perception: Through their funding of research and public health initiatives, the Rockefellers helped shape public perception and policy to favor pharmaceutical and surgical interventions over natural and holistic treatments. This was done, in part, by promoting the idea that only scientifically tested and standardized treatments were valid, while traditional and natural remedies were often dismissed as unscientific or even dangerous.
Marginalization of Alternative Practices: As a result of the Rockefeller-driven changes in medical education and public health policy, alternative practices such as homeopathy, naturopathy, herbal medicine, and other holistic approaches were increasingly marginalized. These practices were often excluded from mainstream medical education and denied legitimacy in the eyes of the medical establishment.
Regulation and Legislation: The Rockefeller influence extended to the regulation of the medical profession and pharmaceutical industry. The American Medical Association (AMA), which became the gatekeeper of medical practice in the U.S., was heavily influenced by the same scientific and pharmaceutical interests that the Rockefeller family supported. This led to tighter regulations on natural medicines and practices, further pushing them to the fringes of the healthcare system.
Funding Research: The Rockefeller Foundation and related entities directed substantial funding towards research that supported pharmaceutical and technological approaches to medicine, while little to no funding was provided for research into natural or holistic medicine. This created a biased body of medical knowledge that favored synthetic drugs and surgical interventions.
Media Influence: The Rockefellers also used their influence over media to promote the benefits of modern, pharmaceutical-based medicine and to downplay or criticize alternative approaches. This helped establish a dominant narrative that pharmaceutical medicine was the only legitimate form of healthcare.
“I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers.” — John D. Rockefeller
During the early 20th century, John D. Rockefeller, a titan of the American business world, sought to leave a lasting legacy. His philanthropic initiatives, particularly in education, led to the creation of the General Education Board (GEB) in 1902 with a donation of over 100 million dollars. On the surface, this seemed like a benevolent move, with Rockefeller expressing a desire to improve the educational system and uplift society. However, a closer inspection reveals a more sinister side to his actions.
Rockefeller’s influence on education was not solely altruistic. The GEB played a pivotal role in imposing a standardized model of education across the nation. This standardisation, while seemingly efficient, carried with it a hidden agenda — to mold a workforce that would serve the interests of industrialists like Rockefeller himself.
By imposing a uniform curriculum and promoting rote memorisation, the GEB aimed to create a compliant and obedient citizenry, well-suited for factory work. The emphasis on conformity stifled creativity and critical thinking, limiting the potential for independent thought and innovation.
In addition to standardisation, Rockefeller’s influence extended to suppressing alternative educational models that posed a threat to the industrialist agenda. Independent and progressive educational methods that encouraged critical thinking and individualism were sidelined in favor of a system designed to produce obedient workers.
Founding:
The General Education Board was founded by John D. Rockefeller Sr. with a $100 million endowment. The board was part of the Rockefeller family's broader philanthropic efforts, particularly in the realm of education.
Goals:
The primary goals of the GEB were to improve public education, support educational institutions, and promote educational reforms. The board aimed to address disparities in educational opportunities and enhance the quality of education in the U.S.
Support for Public Education:
Funding for Schools: The GEB provided financial support to various public schools and educational institutions across the United States. It focused on funding initiatives to improve school facilities, teacher training, and curriculum development.
Rural Education: A significant portion of the GEB’s efforts was directed toward improving education in rural areas, particularly in the southern United States. This included building schools and supporting educational programs in underserved communities.
Educational Reform:
Standardization and Modernization: The GEB played a role in advocating for educational reforms, including the standardization of curricula and the modernization of teaching methods. The board supported initiatives aimed at professionalizing teaching and establishing educational standards.
Influence on Higher Education: The GEB also had a substantial impact on higher education, supporting the development of colleges and universities. It helped fund educational programs and facilities at various institutions.
Legacy and Influence:
Foundations of Modern Education: The GEB’s work contributed to shaping the modern educational system in the U.S. Its efforts in funding and reform laid the groundwork for many aspects of public education as it is known today.
Criticism and Controversy: The GEB faced criticism from some quarters for its influence on educational policy and its role in shaping educational standards. Critics argued that the board’s initiatives sometimes reflected the interests and perspectives of its wealthy benefactors rather than addressing broader educational needs.
Integration into Other Philanthropic Efforts:
In 1952, the GEB was merged into the Rockefeller Foundation, continuing its educational mission under the broader scope of the foundation’s philanthropic activities. The legacy of the GEB’s work remains part of the Rockefeller Foundation’s ongoing efforts in education and development.
Operation Lockstep is a scenario outlined in the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 report titled "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." The report, which is not a real-world operation but rather a speculative exercise, presents a range of potential future scenarios, one of which is called "Lockstep."
Scenario Overview:
Lockstep describes a world where a severe pandemic leads to global lockdowns and stringent government measures to control the spread of the virus. In this scenario, governments around the world implement strict quarantine measures, and surveillance and control mechanisms are significantly increased. The scenario explores how such measures could impact societies, economies, and governance.
Purpose and Context:
The purpose of the scenario was to explore potential future developments and their implications for technology and international development. It aimed to stimulate thinking about how different global challenges could unfold and how societies might respond to them. It was not a prediction or plan but a speculative exercise meant to examine possible outcomes.
Influence and Misinterpretations:
Lockstep has been cited in various conspiracy theories suggesting that it was a plan or blueprint for a real-world pandemic response, particularly in relation to COVID-19. However, it is important to understand that the scenario was developed as part of a broader set of potential futures to encourage strategic thinking and planning, not as a prescriptive or predictive document.
Rockefeller Foundation's Role:
The Rockefeller Foundation funded and published the report as part of its efforts to promote research and dialogue on global issues and technological development. The Foundation’s goal was to provide insights and provoke thought about how different scenarios could impact future global development and policy.
