The Bird Flu Fear Porn
What is Bird Flu?
Bird flu has been deliberately built up in the media over 20 years as an extremely dangerous threat to humans. It was once a threat, but only to a few chicken farmers. Currently it is no threat at all, and if we were not seeking it out so vigorously, we would probably not even know about it. Once upon a time, this virus did kill a small number of people, but less than 500 people worldwide, cumulatively, over more than 20 years. It has never spread person-to-person.
US Government Gain of Function Research is Weaponizing Bird Flu
Hey looks its Anthony Fauci's paid friends Yoshihiro Kawaoka (U Wisconsin) and Ron Fouchier (Erasmus U) who taught bird flu to jump between ferrets (the chosen model for humans) through the air in 2011, and God knows what they have taught bird flu viruses since, on the US taxpayers’ dime.
Ron was on the Feb. 1, 2020 coverup call with Fauci, Farrar and Francis Collins (so many F’s) and he wrote the summary which revealed they already knew of COVID’s lab origin then. Ron provided 6 cover stories for 6 lab-made mutations that had been identified in his summary of the call, to help out the others with their talking points. Showing great loyalty to his funders, and zero loyalty to the human race.
Crafting a Narrative to Cull Cows & Dairy Livestock to Induce Food Shortages
Whistleblower reports indicate the FDA and USDA are conspiring with state agricultural agencies to do the dirty deeds. Below is the letter sent out by FDA to states and the letter sent out by Massachusetts to farms. Note both were sent the same day, indicating this was planned ahead of time. Note that FDA wraps itself in the SCIENCE.
Here’s the important part. For three months FDA/USDA have been desperate to find live bird flu virus in raw or pasteurized milk, but there has been none. They have not found one sick person who got bird flu from any milk.
HPAI (high pathogenicity avian influenza) is the old name but now the mutated virus is LOW pathogenicity but the agencies retained the old name. Why would you do that?
The FDA uses the term HPAI or high pathogenicity avian influenza 20 times (TWENTY) in its one and a half page letter. Get it?
So, biosecurity is key. What is farm biosecurity? PPE for farmworkers? Is the plan to treat this like foot and mouth disease in England, which culled huge number of animals during a Neal Ferguson-related episode in 2001 at a cost of 8 billion pounds (over $10 Billion dollars) paid for by the UK taxpayer.
How was it (Foot and Mouth) stopped?
The primary control measure of the disease in 2001 was the widespread culling of animals. Teams of health officials implemented the immediate culling of any animals showing the disease. This included high risk healthy animals in the local area. While this did eventually get the disease under control, the costs were enormous. In total, around 6.5 million animals were culled. While farmers received compensation, the mental and emotional effects were far-reaching and vast.5
The UK government implemented a complete ban on movement of any livestock animals. People had to stick to very strict biosecurity measures when entering or leaving any agricultural premises. Many farming communities were put under tight movement bans. Social events were completely cancelled over fear of spreading the disease. Parks where there were deer were closed to visitors and trade of animals out of the UK was stopped.
The Massachusetts letter states (MA Ag) will work with the farmer “to develop a farm plan.” We want to “ensure consumer confidence” —the same confidence we are doing our best to erode right now. And if they find something, what will they do?
Next month, the U.S. Agriculture Department is to begin testing a vaccine developed by University of Pennsylvania researchers by giving it to calves. The idea: If vaccinating cows protects dairy workers, that could mean fewer chances for the virus to jump into people and mutate in ways that could spur human-to-human spread.
Meanwhile. the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has been talking to manufacturers about possible mRNA flu vaccines for people that, if needed, could supplement millions of bird flu vaccine doses already in government hands.
“If there's a pandemic, there's going to be a huge demand for vaccine,” said Richard Webby, a flu researcher at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis. “The more different (vaccine manufacturing) platforms that can respond to that, the better."
The bird flu virus has been spreading among more animal species in scores of countries since 2020. It was detected in U.S. dairy herds in March, although investigators think it may have been in cows since December. This week, the USDA announced it had been found in alpacas for the first time.
At least three people — all workers at farms with infected cows — have been diagnosed with bird flu, although the illnesses were considered mild.
But earlier versions of the same H5N1 flu virus have been highly lethal to humans in other parts of the world. Officials are taking steps to be prepared if the virus mutates in a way to make it more deadly or enables it to spread more easily from person to person.
Traditionally, most flu vaccines are made via an egg-based manufacturing process that's been used for more than 70 years. It involves injecting a candidate virus into fertilized chicken eggs, which are incubated for several days to allow the viruses to grow. Fluid is harvested from the eggs and is used as the basis for vaccines, with killed or weakened virus priming the body's immune system.
Rather than eggs — also vulnerable to bird flu-caused supply constraints — some flu vaccine is made in giant vats of cells.
Officials say they already have two candidate vaccines for people that appear to be well-matched to the bird flu virus in U.S. dairy herds. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used the circulating bird flu virus as the seed strain for them.
The government has hundreds of thousands of vaccine doses in pre-filled syringes and vials that likely could go out in a matter of weeks, if needed, federal health officials say.
They also say they have bulk antigen that could generate nearly 10 million more doses that could be filled, finished and distributed in a matter of a few months. CSL Seqirus, which manufactures cell-based flu vaccine, this week announced that the government hired it to fill and finish about 4.8 million of those doses. The work could be done by late summer, U.S. health officials said this week.
But the production lines for flu vaccines are already working on this fall's seasonal shots — work that would have to be interrupted to produce millions more doses of bird flu vaccine. So the government has been pursuing another, quicker approach: the mRNA technology used to produce the primary vaccines deployed against COVID-19.
These messenger RNA vaccines are made using a small section of genetic material from the virus. The genetic blueprint is designed to teach the body how to make a protein used to build immunity.
The pharmaceutical company Moderna already has a bird flu mRNA vaccine in very early-stage human testing. In a statement, Moderna confirmed that “we are in discussions with the U.S. government on advancing our pandemic flu candidate."
Similar work has been going on at Pfizer. Company researchers in December gave human volunteers an mRNA vaccine against a bird flu strain that's similar to — but not exactly the same as — the one in cows. Since then, researchers have performed a lab experiment exposing blood samples from those volunteers to the strain seen in dairy farms, and saw a “notable increases in antibody responses," Pfizer said in a statement.
As for the vaccine for cows, Penn immunologist Scott Hensley worked with mRNA pioneer and Nobel laureate Drew Weissman to produce the experimental doses. Hensley said that vaccine is similar to the Moderna one for people.
In first-step testing, mice and ferrets produced high levels of bird flu virus-fighting antibodies after vaccination.
In another experiment, researchers vaccinated one group of ferrets and deliberately infected them, and then compared what happened to ferrets that hadn't been vaccinated. All the vaccinated animals survived and the unvaccinated did not, Hensley said. [Then clearly ferrets are a bad model since humans barely get sick from infection—or were the ferrets given a lethal bird flu that is extinct?]
“The vaccine was really successful,” said Webby, whose lab did that work last year in collaboration with Hensley.
The cow study will be akin to the first-step testing initially done in smaller animals. The plan is for initially about 10 calves to be vaccinated, half with one dose and half with another. Then their blood will be drawn and examined to look for how much bird flu-fighting antibodies were produced.
The USDA study first will have to determine the right dose for such a large animal, Hensley said, before testing if it protects them like it did smaller animals.
What “scares me the most is the amount of interaction between cattle and humans,” Hensley said.
“We’re not talking about an animal that lives on a mountain top," he said. "If this was a bobcat outbreak I’d feel bad for the bobcats, but that’s not a big human risk.”
If a vaccine reduces the amount of virus in the cow, “then ultimately we reduce the chance that a mutant virus that spreads in humans is going to emerge,” he said.Why is the Mainstream Media Pushing Bird Flu fear porn?
Call for Military Tribunals and the Death Penalty for Bio-Weapons Terrorism and Gain-of-Function Research
In light of the increasing global concern over bio-weapons terrorism and gain-of-function research, it is imperative that we address these issues with the utmost seriousness and accountability. The risks associated with these activities pose grave threats to public health, national security, and global stability. In response, there is an urgent need to hold accountable all parties involved in these dangerous practices through military tribunals and, where applicable, the death penalty.
The Case for Military Tribunals
Accountability for Bio-Weapons Terrorism: Bio-weapons terrorism represents a severe threat to human life and safety. Those who develop, deploy, or support the use of biological agents as weapons should be held accountable under the strictest legal frameworks. Military tribunals, with their focus on national security and wartime conduct, are uniquely positioned to address these threats with the necessary severity and precision.
Clarity and Transparency: Military tribunals offer a specialized forum for adjudicating complex cases involving bio-weapons and gain-of-function research. These tribunals can ensure that the proceedings are conducted with transparency and adherence to the highest standards of justice, thereby upholding the rule of law and maintaining public confidence in the legal process.
International Security Concerns: Given the global nature of bio-weapons threats, military tribunals provide a platform for international cooperation and coordination. These tribunals can involve representatives from multiple countries and organizations to ensure a comprehensive approach to justice and security.
The Case for the Death Penalty
Deterrence: The imposition of the death penalty for those found guilty of bio-weapons terrorism and egregious gain-of-function research could serve as a powerful deterrent. The severe nature of the penalty underscores the gravity of these crimes and may prevent future actors from engaging in similar activities.
Justice for Victims: The potential consequences of bio-weapons and dangerous research can lead to catastrophic loss of life and suffering. The death penalty, while controversial, can be seen as a measure of justice for the victims and their families, providing a sense of closure and accountability.
Prevention of Recidivism: Individuals involved in bio-weapons terrorism or illicit research pose an ongoing threat to global safety. The death penalty ensures that those who have committed such crimes cannot repeat their actions, thereby contributing to long-term security and stability.
Conclusion
The threats posed by bio-weapons terrorism and gain-of-function research are profound and far-reaching. To address these threats effectively, it is essential to pursue military tribunals for all parties involved and consider the death penalty in cases where it is warranted by the severity of the crime. This approach will ensure accountability, uphold the rule of law, and protect global health and security.
Resources
Last updated
