War with Iran is inevitable because it's Biblical
The Case for War with Iran – A Necessary Struggle Against True Evil
As the world watches the actions of the Islamic Republic of Iran unfold, it becomes increasingly evident that we are facing a regime driven by an ideology that threatens not just the stability of the Middle East, but the future of global peace and security. The leadership of Iran, entrenched in a radical theocracy, is committed to spreading an extremist vision of Islam that endangers freedom, justice, and the core values of humanity. This essay argues that, despite the moral weight of pursuing peaceful resolutions, war with Iran is no longer a question of "if," but "when." We must prepare for the inevitable confrontation with a regime whose ambitions, rooted in a dangerous ideology, leave no room for compromise or negotiation.
The Threat of Satanic Islamic Ideology
Iran’s theocratic government has long promoted an extreme form of Satanic Islam that seeks to dominate the political and religious landscape of the region. Led by the Ayatollah and an elite group of clerics, this regime's goal is not only to assert dominance over neighboring countries but to spread its influence far beyond its borders. Through its support for militant groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and various Shia militias, Iran exports violence and instability across the Middle East.
Moreover, Iran's nuclear ambitions pose a grave threat to the global order. Despite international efforts to curb its nuclear program, Iran has repeatedly violated agreements, advancing its enrichment of uranium and moving closer to acquiring a nuclear weapon. A nuclear-armed Iran, driven by a fanatical ideology, would wield immense power to further its destabilizing agenda, emboldening its leaders to act with even greater impunity.
The regime’s ultimate vision is the establishment of a global Islamic caliphate under its rule, and to achieve this, it is willing to use any means necessary—including terrorism, proxy wars, and human rights abuses. The continued existence of this regime, with its apocalyptic worldview, leaves the international community vulnerable to ongoing aggression and destruction. Like the totalitarian ideologies of the 20th century, radical Islam cannot be contained through diplomacy alone. It must be confronted and dismantled.
The Failure of Diplomacy and Sanctions
For decades, the world has attempted to negotiate with Iran. From the Iran nuclear deal (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) to various rounds of economic sanctions, the international community has sought to change Iran’s behavior through diplomacy. However, these efforts have failed to bring about meaningful, long-term change.
Iran’s leaders have mastered the art of deception, using diplomacy as a means to buy time while continuing to build their military capabilities and entrench their power. The nuclear deal, for instance, provided temporary relief, but it did not address the core issue: the ideological commitment of the Iranian regime to pursue its hegemonic ambitions. Sanctions have hurt the Iranian economy but have not broken the regime’s resolve. Instead, ordinary Iranian citizens have suffered under the economic strain, while the ruling elite remains insulated from the consequences.
The hard truth is that diplomacy and sanctions, while well-intentioned, have not succeeded in curbing Iran’s dangerous activities. They have failed because they do not address the fundamental nature of the regime, which is driven by an uncompromising ideology of domination. As history has shown with other totalitarian regimes, diplomacy alone is insufficient when dealing with forces that view negotiation as a weakness to exploit rather than an opportunity for peace.
The Moral Imperative for Action
The regime in Iran represents more than just a political or military threat—it embodies a moral evil that cannot be ignored. Theocratic tyranny suppresses freedom, abuses human rights, and promotes violence. The Iranian people themselves have long suffered under this brutal system, with widespread repression of dissent, persecution of minorities, and a lack of basic freedoms. Women, in particular, have faced systemic oppression under Iran’s harsh Islamic laws.
Internationally, Iran's support for terrorist organizations and its role in destabilizing countries like Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq has led to immense suffering. The Iranian regime is responsible for countless deaths, both directly and indirectly, and continues to fuel the flames of conflict across the region. Allowing such a regime to thrive unchecked is not only a failure of policy but a failure of moral leadership.
Just as the world came together to defeat Nazism in World War II, there is a moral imperative to stand against the Iranian regime and its quest for regional and global dominance. When faced with pure evil, as history has shown, there is often no peaceful resolution. Iran's rulers have demonstrated time and again that they will not relinquish power or alter their course through dialogue. The only solution is to confront this evil head-on, to prevent the further spread of tyranny and destruction.
The Consequences of Inaction
Some may argue that war should be avoided at all costs, that the risks are too high, and that diplomacy should continue. While it is true that war carries significant risks—economic, political, and humanitarian—inaction poses even greater dangers. A failure to confront Iran now means allowing the regime to continue its pursuit of nuclear weapons, to strengthen its alliances with rogue states, and to further entrench its control over the Middle East.
If Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons, the balance of power in the region would shift dramatically, emboldening the regime to act with even greater aggression. The risk of nuclear war, either directly or through proxy forces, would rise exponentially. Additionally, Iran’s continued support for terrorist organizations and proxy militias means that the conflicts in places like Syria, Yemen, and Iraq will drag on indefinitely, with catastrophic consequences for millions of people.
The longer the world waits, the stronger Iran becomes. And the more entrenched its ideology of hatred and violence grows. The consequences of inaction are clear: more violence, more instability, and the potential for global catastrophe.
Preparing for War
War is never a decision to be taken lightly, but when faced with a regime as dangerous and ideologically driven as Iran’s, it becomes a necessary course of action. The Iranian regime has proven itself to be an aggressor, a sponsor of terrorism, and a threat to global security. Its ambitions are incompatible with peace, and its ideology cannot coexist with the values of freedom and justice that underpin the modern world.
The international community must recognize that diplomacy has failed, and that Iran’s leaders will not change course voluntarily. It is time to prepare for the inevitable conflict, to protect the world from the threat of radical theocracy, and to ensure that the Iranian regime’s dangerous ambitions are never realized. The future of global peace depends on our willingness to confront this evil now, before it is too late.
A Biblical Battle of Good vs. Evil
In the Bible, particularly in the Book of Ezekiel (chapters 38-39), Gog and Magog are prophesied to rise against the people of God in the end times, leading a coalition of nations against Israel and all that is righteous. While these prophecies have been interpreted in various ways throughout history, many see a parallel today in the actions of Iran (Gog) and Russia (Magog). Iran, under the leadership of its theocratic regime, promotes a radical vision of Islam that seeks to dominate the region and eradicate Israel, a nation at the center of God’s covenant. Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons and its support for militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas make it clear that it seeks not peace, but destruction.
Iran represents Gog, a prophetic force of evil, and Russia represents Magog, the power that supports it. If Vladimir Putin chooses to continue supporting the Iranian regime, he will face not only political consequences but eternal damnation. Furthermore, I will explain why, in the event of a Trump presidency, it is essential to use Iran as a pawn in negotiations with Russia, ensuring that Moscow divests from its support of Tehran. Only then can we secure peace in Ukraine, defeat the evil forces in Iran, and restore the relationship between Russia and America.
Vladimir Putin, by aligning himself with Iran, is not merely making a strategic miscalculation—he is placing himself on the wrong side of history and the wrong side of God. If Putin continues to support Iran, both militarily and economically, he is actively participating in a spiritual war that will end in his destruction. Scripture makes it clear that those who align with Gog and Magog will face God’s judgment. This is not a matter of earthly politics alone; it is a matter of eternal consequence.
Russia will not escape unscathed if it continues on this path. The alliance with Iran, steeped in evil and hatred, will ultimately lead to Russia's downfall. Russia will be destroyed—both by the wrath of God and the geopolitical consequences of its actions. By standing with Iran, Putin is aligning himself with forces that seek to plunge the world into chaos and war. The destruction of Russia is not just a hypothetical scenario; it is a biblical certainty if Putin refuses to change course.
Understanding the Enemy: IRGC Controls 50% of Iran's Economy
The IRGC’s members span four generations. The first generation—its founders, who joined during the Iran-Iraq War (1980–88)—is primarily made up of Iranian revolutionaries who hailed from poor conservative and religious families. When Khamenei assumed power as supreme leader in 1989, most of this generation retired or was purged. (Many of its members were supporters of Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, who was the favorite to succeed Ruhollah Khomeini as Iran’s supreme leader, and were unhappy with Khamenei’s rise.) But those loyal to the new supreme leader stuck around, and he rewarded them with great economic influence over Iran—including by ignoring their corruption.
The second generation joined the IRGC in the decade after the Iran-Iraq War, when the Revolutionary Guards expanded into carrying out lucrative postwar reconstruction projects. Unlike those in the first generation, who joined for ideology and only later fell into wealth, members of this cohort signed up primarily in pursuit of riches. Many were comparatively uninterested in rigid Islamist principles. According to the memoirs of former Iranian President Hashemi Rafsanjani, a confidant of Khomeini, only around 15 percent of the second generation voted for the candidate Khamenei endorsed in the 1997 presidential elections.
The IRGC now controls more than 50 percent of the Iranian economy. This lack of loyalty set off alarm bells for the supreme leader. As a result, during the first decade of the 2000s, he began working to make the IRGC a more explicitly ideological group. Khamenei increased the time the IRGC spent on what the organization calls “ideological and political training,” or lectures, seminars, religious preaching, and religious ceremonies promoting Khamenei’s hard-line Shiite doctrines. The effort was a success. IRGC members who joined during the first decade of the 2000s—the Revolutionary Guards’ third generation—proved very faithful to the Islamic Republic’s principles and rule. They had few qualms, for example, about suppressing mass protests against the regime in 2009.
Ad-Dajjal Khamenini Creates an Army of Religious Fundamentalists
Khamenei, pleased by this loyalty, doubled down on making the IRGC ideologically pure. He dedicated additional time to political indoctrination, increasing such programming to 50 percent of all IRGC training. He reworked how new members were admitted. For most of its history, joining the IRGC was relatively easy for Iranians with a religious background. But starting in 2010, the organization replaced its open application process with one that was by invitation only, exclusively recruiting those who had been scouted and pre-approved. The most crucial criteria for receiving an invitation were religiosity and loyalty to the supreme leader.
The result is the IRGC’s fourth generation. It is even more radical than the third. Like their predecessors, these youngest members have been happy to suppress antiregime protests, openly gunning down demonstrators in 2019, 2022, and 2023. But they have also been disproportionately eager to deploy to Syria, where they have fought to prop up President Bashar al-Assad’s regime under the notion that they are defending a holy Shiite shrines. Finally, and with Khamenei’s encouragement, they have gone after less ideologically pure elements of the wider Islamic Republic, including Hassan Rouhani, a former Iranian president.
In 2019, Khamenei issued a manifesto proclaiming that the IRGC should be the model for all state institutions. Iran’s bureaucracy, Khamenei argued, ought to be “young and hezbollahi” (ideologically hard line). He tasked his son and likely successor, Mojtaba, with following through on this command. Both men aimed to consolidate Khamenei’s personal control over Iran and ensure a smooth transition of power after his death.
Judged by the manifesto’s terms, Mojtaba’s reorganization was a success. Iran’s bureaucracy began hiring and promoting young IRGC radicals, leading to more hard-line foreign and domestic policies. But this transition came with drawbacks. Although the government’s new IRGC-trained officials had the right ideological résumés, they were not up to the task of actually running a government. As a result, their elevation worsened Iran’s structural crises, including its ailing economy and many environmental disasters. The political gap between the Iranian regime and the Iranian people widened.
For Khamenei, empowering younger radicals backfired in another way: it fostered divisions within the IRGC itself. Instructed by Khamenei to go after Iran’s unscrupulous and less Islamist leaders, the organization’s younger corps naturally began attacking some of its oligarchs, accusing them of being corrupted by financial interests and of being too timid in their dealings with the West. Some outwardly declared that IRGC leaders—including Ali Shamkhani, the former secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, Iran’s speaker of parliament—were engaging in graft.
These radicals felt betrayed when Tehran refused to strike Israel directly after the latter’s initial set of attacks. Even after the IRGC sent hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel in April 2024, many younger officials were unhappy. Iran’s retaliation failed to deal real damage to its adversary, and IRGC radicals saw the response as largely symbolic.
These allegations have put major pressure on Khamenei and the IRGC’s senior leadership to strike hard against Israel. It is, in part, why Iran launched such a massive attack this month. But the October 1 barrage, like the April one, will not silence the IRGC’s younger cohort. In fact, the group’s radicals are likely to be emboldened. Khamenei may find the young radicals frustrating, but he has probably concluded that their allegations are partially correct. It is hard to imagine that no IRGC officials are working with Israel since Haniyeh was killed by a remote-controlled bomb at an IRGC-run safe house. Khamenei will thus have little choice but to purge parts of his senior ranks and replace them with younger officials.
Israel & the United States Must Strike Now
Khamenini is 85 years old. He will soon be dead and his death will expedite Iran’s radicalization. He has created an army of the Antichrist. The only options for Israel and the United States is to obliterate this evil before it can metasize into an even bigger issue. We are looking at a Hitler level threat to humanity. And actions must be taken now before Iran succeeds in it's development of nuclear weapons which will be under the control of brainwashed satanic religous fanatics.
The Path Forward: Using Iran as a Pawn in U.S.-Russia Negotiations
In the event of a Trump presidency, the United States has a unique opportunity to use Iran as leverage in its dealings with Russia. The Trump administration must make it clear that Iran is a linchpin in any potential reconciliation between Russia and the West. By persuading Russia to divest from its relationship with Iran, both militarily and economically, the U.S. can achieve several crucial objectives: weakening the Iranian regime, ensuring the success of the broader campaign against radical Islam, and opening the door for peace in Ukraine.
Trump is a negotiator at heart, and he understands the value of strategic bargaining. Iran can and should be used as a pawn in these negotiations. The message to Putin must be clear: if Russia wants to secure its interests in Ukraine and restore its relations with the United States, it must abandon its support for Iran. No more military aid, no more economic partnerships—Russia must sever its ties with Tehran if it wishes to avoid both earthly destruction and eternal damnation.
The conflict in Ukraine has strained U.S.-Russia relations to a breaking point, but the war with Iran and its eventual defeat could pave the way for a new chapter in U.S.-Russia relations. By negotiating with Putin and making Iran the key issue, Trump can force Russia to choose between two paths: continued support for a regime of evil, or the chance to restore its standing in the world by working alongside the West to defeat that regime.
If Putin agrees to distance himself from Iran, this will not only weaken the theocratic regime in Tehran, but it will also create the conditions for a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. Russia and the U.S. could once again be allies, working together to bring stability to Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Such a partnership would not only benefit both nations, but it would also create a stronger, more unified front against the forces of radicalism and tyranny that threaten global peace.
The alliance between Russia and Iran represents a modern manifestation of the biblical forces of Gog and Magog, forces of evil that seek to dominate and destroy. If Vladimir Putin continues down this path, he will lead his country to ruin and face eternal damnation. But there is still time for a different course—if Russia is willing to sever its ties with Iran, there is hope for peace and reconciliation.
Any future Trump administration must seize this opportunity to use Iran as a pawn in negotiations with Russia. By doing so, the U.S. can ensure the success of the war against Iran, bring peace to Ukraine, and restore a positive relationship with Russia. This is not just a political necessity; it is a spiritual imperative in the battle between good and evil. The future of global peace depends on the choices made in the coming years, and those choices will determine whether we stand with the forces of God or fall with the forces of darkness.
Last updated