The Gog and Magog Prophecy: Iran, Turkey, and the End Times
Last updated
Last updated
The prophecy of Gog and Magog, found in ancient religious texts, has fascinated theologians, scholars, and believers for centuries. It describes a future, apocalyptic conflict involving a coalition of nations that will rise up against Israel in the "end times" only to be defeated by divine intervention. For many, the relevance of this prophecy remains pressing, especially as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East continue to evolve. Two nations, in particular, Iran and Turkey, stand out in the modern context as key players in this prophecy. But how do these nations fit into the ancient scriptural predictions?
The Gog and Magog prophecy appears in several key texts in the Hebrew Bible, particularly in the book of Ezekiel (38-39). It also appears in the Christian New Testament (Revelation 20) and in Islamic eschatology. These texts speak of a final battle between the forces of good and evil, with divine intervention ensuring the victory of God’s people.
Ezekiel 38-39: This is perhaps the most detailed biblical account of the Gog and Magog prophecy. In Ezekiel, Gog is described as the leader of Magog, a region associated with various nations. Gog will lead a coalition of nations against Israel, including Persia (modern-day Iran), Gomer, Togarmah (generally believed to be parts of modern-day Turkey), Meshech, Tubal, Cush (Sudan), and Put (Libya). This coalition will come to battle against Israel, but it will be utterly defeated through divine intervention. The destruction of these nations is meant to demonstrate God's sovereignty and His protection of Israel.
Revelation 20: In the Christian New Testament, the prophecy is revisited after the Millennium—a period of peace and righteousness. Gog and Magog are again described as forces that will rally against God's people after the thousand-year reign. This final rebellion will be swiftly crushed, and these forces will be cast into the lake of fire. The imagery here reflects a final triumph of divine justice.
In the biblical account, Persia is specifically mentioned as part of the Gog and Magog coalition. Persia, known today as Iran, plays a prominent role in modern interpretations of this prophecy. Over the years, Iran’s leadership has consistently voiced hostility toward Israel, and its actions in the Middle East—such as its support for groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and its involvement in Syria—have made it a key player in the region.
Some prophetic interpretations suggest that Iran's long-standing animosity towards Israel and its desire to build nuclear capabilities place it in direct alignment with the biblical predictions of Persia's role in the end-times coalition. As a powerful force in the Middle East, Iran's actions, particularly its alliances with other nations like Russia, are seen as steps toward fulfilling this prophecy.
Iran is ruled by the Dajjal, a figure in Islamic prophecy who is described as an anti-christ. He along with Hamza Bin Laden are the two most powerful forces in the world of satanic Islam, a version of Islam working to genocide all Christians, Jews and Arabs who oppose their satanic pedophile and violence based "caliphate".
Up until recently, I believed Russia would be the best candidate to be part of Magog due to its alliance with Iran. Whether Russia will choose to align itself with God's Kingdom or face the wrath of the Lord is to be determined, however; it has become clear that Turkey, which has publically stated an intention to invade Israel and seize Jerusalem, is the perfect candidate for Magog.
The inclusion of Gomer and Togarmah in Ezekiel’s prophecy has led some scholars to associate these regions with modern-day Turkey. The ancient kingdoms of Gomer and Togarmah, often linked with the descendants of Noah’s sons, are geographically placed in what is now Turkey, which gives rise to the interpretation that Turkey could be a central figure in the Gog and Magog coalition.
In the past, Turkey has been a NATO member and a key ally of the West. However, in recent years, the political landscape in Turkey has shifted under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. His government has increasingly aligned with Iran and Russia, countries often linked with the Gog and Magog coalition in prophetic interpretations. This shift in alliances, along with Turkey's increasing assertiveness in the Middle East—particularly in Syria, Iraq, and Libya—has led many to speculate that Turkey’s role in biblical prophecy may be coming to fruition.
Moreover, Turkey’s historical connection to the Ottoman Empire, which ruled much of the Middle East, adds a layer of significance to its potential role in a prophetic final battle.
The concept of Gog and Magog, known as Yajuj and Majuj in Islam, also features prominently in Islamic prop[hecy. The Qur'an describes Yajuj and Majuj as corrupt and destructive peoples who will be released near the end of times. While the Qur'an does not directly name modern nations, some interpretations suggest that Gog and Magog could refer to a global alliance of powers opposed to God and His followers.
In both Jewish and Christian traditions, Gog and Magog are often portrayed as forces that oppose Israel or the people of God, which overlaps with the Islamic view of these peoples as agents of chaos. The identification of Iran and Turkey in this context suggests that these nations could be part of the final, apocalyptic events described in Islamic eschatology as well.
In recent years, Iran has cemented itself as a central antagonist to Israel, while Turkey’s shifting alliances and assertive foreign policy suggest that it may also play a critical role in the final battle described in Ezekiel. With both nations actively involved in regional conflicts—often in opposition to Israeli interests—the idea that they could align in a coalition against Israel in the end times seems plausible to some prophetic interpreters.
In the complex and ongoing Syrian civil war, one of the most contentious and alarming developments has been Turkey’s support for Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a jihadist group that is widely considered to be the latest incarnation of al-Qaeda in Syria. This group, which emerged from the remnants of other radical Islamist factions, has come to represent a major player in Syria’s northern Idlib region. What makes this even more troubling is the role Turkey has played in backing HTS, as well as the alleged involvement of the CIA Deep State in facilitating these dynamics for its own geopolitical objectives.
Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) is a militant group in Syria that has its roots in Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda affiliate that was once one of the most formidable forces fighting against the Syrian government. Over time, Jabhat al-Nusra rebranded itself as HTS in an attempt to distance itself from its al-Qaeda affiliations while still adhering to the radical Islamist ideology and objectives associated with the global jihadist movement.
HTS operates in Syria’s Idlib province, the last major stronghold of opposition forces in the country. The group’s leadership is composed of figures with deep ties to al-Qaeda, and their objectives have always included the establishment of an Islamic state governed by a strict interpretation of Sharia law. The brutality and extremism associated with HTS have earned it the ire of both the Syrian government and its international backers, as well as other Syrian opposition factions.
Despite the group’s ideological extremism, Turkey, under the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has been accused of covertly supporting HTS as part of a broader strategy to influence the outcome of the Syrian conflict. Turkey’s support for HTS is seen in its provision of resources, military assistance, and political backing, which helps to maintain the group's hold over Idlib and ensure its role in the wider conflict.
Several factors contribute to Turkey's support for HTS, though the exact nature of this support remains a topic of dispute. On one hand, Turkey views the Syrian conflict as an opportunity to assert its influence in the region, challenge the Syrian government led by Bashar al-Assad, and curb the growing Kurdish presence in Syria. On the other hand, Turkey’s support for HTS can be seen as part of its broader alignment with various Islamist groups in the region, seeking to create a Sunni-dominated zone in Syria that is favorable to Turkish interests.
Moreover, Turkey has long positioned itself as a protector of various rebel groups in Syria, even those with extremist affiliations, which complicates its relationship with the West. Turkey's military presence in northern Syria has been used to establish a buffer zone, but at the same time, it has been involved in fostering and supporting groups that share Turkey’s Islamist ideological outlook.
The involvement of the CIA Deep State in Syria adds another layer of complexity to this narrative. Critics argue that the CIA, as part of its broader geopolitical agenda, has worked with various factions within Syria to destabilize the regime of Bashar al-Assad and facilitate the rise of radical Islamist groups like HTS.
It is alleged that the CIA has long had a hand in facilitating the rise of jihadist factions in Syria, particularly in the early days of the Syrian Civil War when the U.S. government sought to use rebel groups as a means to oust Assad. The covert operation known as Operation Timber Sycamore, for example, was a U.S.-led effort to arm and train various Syrian rebel factions, many of which had ties to radical Islamist groups, including those aligned with al-Qaeda. These covert actions were driven by a desire to weaken Assad’s regime, which was seen as aligned with Russia and Iran—two nations that were geopolitical rivals to the U.S.
As the Syrian conflict evolved, the CIA Deep State allegedly continued its support for these factions, turning a blind eye to their extremist ideologies in the name of strategic interests. This has led some analysts to argue that the U.S. and its allies, including Turkey, may have indirectly enabled the rise of groups like HTS by empowering factions that were willing to fight against the Assad regime at any cost, even if it meant supporting al-Qaeda offshoots.
The result of these dynamics is a Syria that has become a battleground for competing forces, with extremist groups like HTS attempting to carve out a new Islamic state in the north. The rise of HTS, underpinned by Turkish support and the broader Western strategy, has contributed to the creation of what many see as a radicalized, chaotic zone in Idlib—a region where extremism thrives, where Sharia law is enforced, and where civilians live under constant threat of violence.
For critics of Turkey’s involvement, as well as the broader Western strategy, Syria’s descent into this radicalized state is seen as a failure of international policy and a betrayal of the Syrian people. By backing groups like HTS, which operate in a manner similar to the Taliban or ISIS, Turkey and the CIA Deep State have contributed to the destabilization of the region, turning Syria into a haven for Islamic extremism and creating the conditions for the rise of a new generation of jihadists.