Investigating COVID-19 Vaccines

There has been ongoing debate and investigation into the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines since their emergency use authorization and subsequent full approval. This interest is due to the critical role these vaccines play in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Here’s an overview of key points regarding the efficacy and potential negative health effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines, as well as the current status of investigations and studies:

Statement from Rep. Darrell Issa

Biden Administration Delays Release of COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Data Until 2026

In a move to skirt justice, truth and transparency, the Biden Administration's Department of Justice (DOH) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reportedly requested for an 18-month stay with regard to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request lodged by America First Legal (AFL) and Just The News. The FOIA request sought to obtain data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

According to the two agencies, an influx of pandemic-related FOIA requests is overwhelming the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). They added that releasing vaccine records requires extensive staff training and onboarding, which could take up to two years. While staffers were reportedly hired for this purpose, they are still undergoing training. (Related: The FDA is a front organization that has allowed vaccine manufacturers to pillage the world for decades.)

FOIA requires government agencies to release requested information unless it negatively affects interests like personal privacy, national security and law enforcement. But according to the motion filed by the HHS and DOJ, the FDA has been dealing with FOIA requests amounting to "approximately 5.7 million pages of COVID-19 vaccine records in a compressed timeframe."

According to the National Pulse, AFL and Just The News are suing the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to obtain data on COVID-19 vaccine reactions. These reports are ostensibly "kept in a back-end, nonpublic system" separate from the publicly accessible VAERS.

Five US States Sue Pfizer over COVID-19 Fraud

Earlier this month Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach sued pharma giant Pfizer alleging, “Pfizer misled the public that it had a ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine.” Now, another four US states - Texas, Utah, Mississippi, and Louisiana - are joining the alliance to rub the lawsuit on Pfizer's face.

Claims

  1. Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress, and omit material facts relating to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.

  2. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data – the study was repeatedly delayed, including a delay from January 2023 to February 2024 because of a late vaccination of a single study participant (out of 44,000 participants).

  3. The FDA did not immediately make the safety and effectiveness data for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine available, claiming it would take 55 years, but a federal judge forced them to release 55,000 pages per month rather than 500.

  4. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group once the FDA approved emergency use authorization in December 2020.

  5. In its press release announcing the emergency use authorization, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its COVID-19 vaccine trials.

  6. Pfizer knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.

  7. By March 2021, the United States military and Israel's Ministry of Health detected a safety signal for myocarditis.

  8. In August 2021, after Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorization to provide its COVID-19 vaccine to 12-15-year-olds, Pfizer decided to study “how often” its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis in children by testing 5-16-year-olds for troponin I.

  9. Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes. The FDA's and CDC's “surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and strokes in people aged 65 and over," and an FDA study found that individuals 85 years or older who received both a flu vaccine and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine “saw a 20% increase in the risk of ischemic stroke.”

  10. Pfizer’s knowledge of a safety signal for increased fatalities. In February 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

  11. Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 trial participants who were in the 65- to 85-year-old age range and did not test it on any participant older than 85.

  12. Pfizer did not publicly release adverse event data from its database. By February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events from 42,086 case reports, including 1,223 fatalities, although Pfizer did not make causality findings. Pfizer was receiving so many adverse events reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “nonserious cases.” Pfizer did not know “the magnitude of under-reporting.

  13. Pfizer announced a study on pregnant women but omitted the fact that more than one in ten women (52) who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination. Six women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported premature deliveries; several babies died.

  14. Pfizer’s February 18th, 2021, press release also did not disclose other adverse effects on the reproductive systems of women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. By April 2022, Pfizer knew of tens of thousands of adverse advents connected to its COVID-19 vaccine, including heavy menstrual bleeding (27,685), menstrual disorders (22,145), irregular periods (15,083), delayed periods (13,989), absence of periods (11,363) and other reproductive system effects.

  15. Pfizer’s study on pregnant women failed. They destroyed the placebo control group, and the results were kept secret.

  16. Pfizer misrepresented and concealed material facts relating to the durability of protection provided by its COVID-19 vaccine.

  17. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission even though it knew it had never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission.

  18. Despite admissions by Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla and Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb that Pfizer did not know if its vaccine prevented transmission, Dr. Bourla warned Kansans on multiple occasions that not receiving a COVID-19 vaccine would affect the lives of those around them, thus implying that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission.

  19. Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims. On July 19th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed social media companies had an “obligation” and an “affirmative responsibility” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on their platforms. Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla called people who spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.”

  20. Pfizer worked to conceal and suppress material facts. On August 24th, 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb contacted Twitter to complain about a column written by Alex Berenson that criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci. On August 27th, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb had a conference call with Twitter employees to discuss Mr. Berenson. Twitter banned Mr. Berenson the next day. Dr. Gottlieb also contacted Twitter about removing posts related to natural immunity, which "Twitter later slapped with a misleading label and blocked the ability to like or share the tweet."

Biden Administration Pressured FDA and Ignored Risks During Initial COVID Vaccine Phase

House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust, led by Chairman Thomas Massie (R-KY), released an interim staff report titled, "Politics, Private Interests, and the Biden Administration's Deviation from Agency Regulations in the COVID-19 Pandemic." The report details how the Biden Administration pressured the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to go beyond its regulatory authority to change its procedures, cut corners, and lower agency standards to approve the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and authorize boosters. This approval enabled the Biden Administration to mandate the COVID-19 vaccine, despite concerns that the same vaccine was causing injury among otherwise healthy young Americans.

Reference: https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/new-report-biden-administration-pressured-fda-and-ignored-risks-during-initial

9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules CoV Injections Are Not Vaccines

"Addressing the merits, the panel held that the district court misapplied the Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), in concluding that the Policy survived rational basis review. Jacobson held that mandatory vaccinations were rationally related to preventing the spread of smallpox. Here, however, plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient and therefore is akin to a medical treatment, not a “traditional” vaccine. Taking plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of litigation, plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively “prevent the spread” of COVID-19. Thus, Jacobson does not apply."

In: Case: 22-55908, 06/07/2024, ID: 12890145, DktEntry: 54-1, Page 1 of 33 In Health Freedom Defense Fund v. Los Angeles Unified School District!

References:

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/22-55908/22-55908-2024-06-07.html

Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan testifies before an Australian Senate Committee that in Pfizer’s own clinical trial there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than the placebo group.

Dr. Christine Stabell Benn Shares the Alarming Results of Her New Study Showing COVID mRNA Vaccines Can Negatively Affect the Innate Immune System for Months

Cancer risk soars 52% among fully vaccinated aged 15-59, pathologist finds

A Croatian pathologist by the name of Ivana Pavic spoke with investigator Steve Kirsch recently about a disturbing phenomenon she is observing in people who got "vaccinated" for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

According to Pavic, 65 percent of all carcinoma cases among people aged 15 through 59 received one or more injections for the Chinese Virus, this with a 55 percent vaccination rate overall in the same age group.

Calculated out, this means that getting jabbed for COVID increases one's risk of this particular form of cancer by 52 percent, something that was not disclosed when the shots were pushed through Operation Warp Speed.

Resource: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-03-10-cancer-risk-increases-52-percent-fully-vaccinated.html

Dr. Sabine Hazan: COVID vaccines killing the bifidobacteria in your gut, destroying immunity

Dr. Francis Boyle Provides Affidavit that COVID 19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons

Dr. Francis Boyle, a Harvard educated law professor that drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, Provides Affidavit that COVID 19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction

Dr. Boyle stated that the COVID-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175 and Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023).

This affidavit was presented in a Florida case involving an Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, aiming to convince Governor DeSantis to ban the distribution of these injections in Florida. Additionally, it seeks to compel Attorney General Ashley Moody to confiscate the vials.

3 Top FDA Vaccine Experts Fired by Biden Administration

Congressman Massie testified that the experts requested more time to study side effects of the Covid-19 shots in children and young adults.

Last updated